starring Dan Donohue
directed by Bill Rauch
(Editor’s note: This is part one in a series by Debra Murphy on the 2010 Oregon Shakespeare Festival production of Hamlet at the Angus Bowmer Theatre in Ashland, Oregon until October 30.)
When it was announced back in the summer of 2009 that the Oregon Shakespeare Festival’s 2010 season would include a Hamlet directed by Festival Artistic Director Bill Rauch, Clan Murphy went all a-flutter (and a-Twitter). First off, we figured that Rauch would bring some warmth, theatricality and menschlichkeit to a play that seems to invite catastrophic Scylla vs. Charybdis production choices.
I mean, how to do this wonderful, gnarly, hoary terrifying play? If you’ve seen more than three or four Hamlets, you may know what I’m saying: On the one side is the creaking-at-the-knees Thou Shalt Not Mess with this Sacrosanct Relic school of theatre production, and on the other, the acrobatically innovative “high concept” approach that resembles nothing so much as Pretzel-Position No. 108 in The Shakespearean Tantric Sex Manual.
Moreover, since “you can’t have Hamlet without the Prince”, the other half of the Clan’s flutteratility had to do, natch, with casting. Instantaneously and unanimously we all began sending Positive Thoughts in a Heavenly direction to the effect that Dan Donohue, much missed in the 2009 season after his jaw-dropping Iago in 2008 (see here and here), would be the One. A barefoot pilgrimage to Compostela was discussed, but alas the economic downturn put the kibosh on the notion and Clan Murphy had to settle for a Novena.
Notwithstanding, our Piety was rewarded, DD it was to be, and the Clan spent a goodly seven or eight months on tenterhooks as to what Rauch & Donohue & Co would give us with their Dane.
Well, what they have given us is one of the funniest–you read that right, “funny”–most surprising and downright entertaining Hamlets I have ever seen. That is no small achievement given that I have seen, by last count, filmed or staged, eighteen different productions.
Yikes, it’s a disease.
So I’ve seen traditional BBC-ish Hamlets and Oedipal Hamlets; I’ve seen political and philosophical and surrealist Hamlets; I’ve seen fey and ADHD and melancholic and existential and romantic and postmodern and Russian Hamlets. Cataloging them all makes me sound like dotty old Polonius. Could it be then that my “overexposure” to the material has made me love this quirky version so much, just because it’s a little different? Could it be that if I had only seen two or three prior productions, I might be less inclined to favor the—one might almost say— “eccentric” treatment given us here? I doubt it. It sure as heck wasn’t a Hamlet I would have ever come up with, were I a director; but it’s still one of my favorites, and I’d like to tell you why…
But first, leave us acknowledge that in spite of glowing reviews (see here and here) groundling-grumblings have been noised abroad among some of the locals. (See here and here.) A couple of the production’s less “traditional” approaches have not met with universal approbation. Still, in my personal hearing at least, I think it is noteworthy that complaints have come exclusively from folks my age (56) or older, while the young people of my acquaintance (and family) have come away positively jazzed about this Hamlet.
Does this connote some sort of generation gap in theatrical and artistic sensibilities? If so that ‘s odd, given that we AARP-eligibles folk are products of the topsy-turvy Sixties & Seventies. (Did we, long ago, not worship at the altars of the Beatles and Led Zeppelin, whilst our elders bemoaned the Death of Music?) Still, it is rather amazing (and amusing) to note how many of us bardolatrous ex-hippies, even in a town as “progressive” as Ashland, have developed des idées fixes about how we want our Shakespeare (especially this Shakespeare) staged.
And so it has always been. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.
As for me…well, maybe when one has sat down to as many versions of this play as I have, one’s perspective needs must acquire more than one’s usual allotment of flexibility. All I know is, where I sit, there seldom seems anything “new under the sun” to be had from this or that Elsinore, and all I ask anymore of a production, whether “traditional” or “high concept”, is that it display dramatic energy and a coherent vision. For me this production had both in spades…plus a few eye-popping never-seen-that-before-but-where-have-you-been-all-my-life surprises that made this jaded Hamleteer sit up and take notice.
For that reason—before I chat about some of these very cool innovations — oh that word — I’d like to take this opportunity to issue a major SPOILER ALERT. If you haven’t seen the production yet this season and are intending to, which I strongly urge you to do, stop reading and come back here afterward. There are goodies in this 2010 OSF Hamlet that are way too much fun to have spoiled by prior information.
Stay tuned. Next time, part two: The Play-before-the-Play





Ever since I began writing 
Recent Comments