Print
  • Share/Bookmark

Antic Disposition: OSF 2010 Hamlet

dan-hamlet-thumb

starring Dan Donohue
directed by Bill Rauch

(Editor’s note: This is part one in a series by Debra Murphy on the 2010 Oregon Shakespeare Festival  production of Hamlet at the Angus Bowmer Theatre in Ashland, Oregon until October 30.)

Dan Donohue as Hamlet, OSF 2010 -- photo by David Cooper

Dan Donohue as Hamlet, OSF 2010 -- photo by David Cooper

When it was announced back in the summer of 2009 that the Oregon Shakespeare Festival’s 2010 season would include a Hamlet directed by Festival Artistic Director Bill Rauch, Clan Murphy went all a-flutter (and a-Twitter).  First off, we figured that Rauch would bring some warmth, theatricality and menschlichkeit to a play that seems to invite catastrophic Scylla vs. Charybdis production choices.

I mean, how to do this wonderful, gnarly, hoary terrifying play? If you’ve seen more than three or four Hamlets, you may know what I’m saying: On the one side is the creaking-at-the-knees Thou Shalt Not Mess with this Sacrosanct Relic school of theatre production, and on the other, the acrobatically innovative “high concept” approach that resembles nothing so much as Pretzel-Position No. 108 in The Shakespearean Tantric Sex Manual.

Moreover, since “you can’t have Hamlet without the Prince”, the other half of the Clan’s flutteratility had to do, natch, with casting. Instantaneously and unanimously we all began sending Positive Thoughts in a Heavenly direction to the effect that Dan Donohue, much missed in the 2009 season after his jaw-dropping Iago in 2008 (see here and here), would be the One. A barefoot pilgrimage to Compostela was discussed, but alas the economic downturn put the kibosh on the notion and Clan Murphy had to settle for a Novena.

Notwithstanding, our Piety was rewarded, DD it was to be, and the Clan spent a goodly seven or eight months on tenterhooks as to what Rauch & Donohue & Co would give us with their Dane.

Well, what they have given us is one of the funniest–you read that right, “funny”–most surprising and downright entertaining Hamlets I have ever seen. That is no small achievement given that I have seen, by last count, filmed or staged, eighteen different productions.

Yikes, it’s a disease.

So I’ve seen traditional BBC-ish Hamlets and Oedipal Hamlets; I’ve seen political and philosophical and surrealist Hamlets; I’ve seen fey and ADHD and melancholic and existential and romantic and postmodern and Russian Hamlets. Cataloging them all makes me sound like dotty old Polonius. Could it be then that my “overexposure” to the material has made me love this quirky version so much, just because it’s a little different? Could it be that if I had only seen two or three prior productions, I might be less inclined to favor the—one might almost say— “eccentric” treatment given us here? I doubt it. It sure as heck wasn’t a Hamlet I would have ever come up with, were I a director; but it’s still one of my favorites, and I’d like to tell you why

But first, leave us acknowledge that in spite of glowing reviews (see here and here) groundling-grumblings have been noised abroad among some of the locals. (See here and here.) A couple of the production’s less “traditional” approaches have not met with universal approbation. Still, in my personal hearing at least, I think it is noteworthy that complaints have come exclusively from folks my age (56) or older, while the young people of my acquaintance (and family) have come away positively jazzed about this Hamlet.

Does this connote some sort of generation gap in theatrical and artistic sensibilities? If so that ‘s odd, given that we AARP-eligibles folk are products of the topsy-turvy Sixties & Seventies. (Did we, long ago, not worship at the altars of the Beatles and Led Zeppelin, whilst our elders bemoaned the Death of Music?) Still, it is rather amazing (and amusing) to note how many of us bardolatrous ex-hippies, even in a town as “progressive” as Ashland, have developed des idées fixes about how we want our Shakespeare (especially this Shakespeare) staged.

And so it has always been.  Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

As for me…well, maybe when one has sat down to as many versions of this play as I have, one’s perspective needs must acquire more than one’s usual allotment of flexibility. All I know is, where I sit, there seldom seems anything “new under the sun” to be had from this or that Elsinore, and all I ask anymore of a production, whether “traditional” or “high concept”, is that it display dramatic energy and a coherent vision. For me this production had both in spades…plus a few eye-popping never-seen-that-before-but-where-have-you-been-all-my-life surprises that made this jaded Hamleteer sit up and take notice.

For that reason—before I chat about some of these very cool innovations — oh that word — I’d like to take this opportunity to issue a major SPOILER ALERT. If you haven’t seen the production yet this season and are intending to, which I strongly urge you to do, stop reading and come back here afterward. There are goodies in this 2010 OSF Hamlet that are way too much fun to have spoiled by prior information.

Stay tuned. Next time, part two: The Play-before-the-Play

  • Share/Bookmark

Death and the King's Horseman, OSF 2009

photo by Jenny Graham

photo by Jenny Graham

[N.B. Bardolatry owes its opportunity to comment early on this marvelous production to director Chuck Smith, who generously offered the parishioners of Our Lady of the Mountain Catholic Church the opportunity to see the dress rehearsal on February 11. Ah, the bennies of living in beautiful Ashland, Oregon! The good news for the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, in this recession...we'll be buying tickets for a second viewing.]

On a website devoted to reviewing productions of Shakespeare, “spoiler alerts” are largely unnecessary, so famiiar are the plots of the Bard’s classic plays. But for those contemplating seeing this production of Wole Soyinka’s 1975 Death and the King’s Horseman, I’d like to issue one straightaway: By all means, go see it, it is a gorgeous production; but if you know nothing about the play—about the plot or its background—my best recommendation is to quit reading this post right now, and avoid reading the material in the playbill till after you’ve seen it. We went into the dress rehearsal cold, there were no playbills yet available, and as a result we had one of those rare and wonderful experiences of complete theatrical surprise.

So consider yourself warned: Spoiler Alert.

Here’s the plot of the first half, in a nutshell, from Wikipedia:

According to a Yoruba tradition, the death of the Chief must be followed by the ritual suicide of the Chief’s Horseman as the Horseman’s spirit is essential to helping the Chief’s spirit ascend to the afterlife. Otherwise the Chief’s spirit will wander the earth and bring harm to the Yoruba people. The first half of the play documents the process of this ritual, with the potent, life-loving figure Elesin living out his final day in celebration before the final process begins.

The “celebration” for the larger-than-life Elesin—Derrick Lee Weeden in one of his finest roles—involves one last fling with a young beauty he spots in the Market—this, in spite of the dire warnings of the Mother of the Market, Iyaloja (Perri Gaffney) that it could bring about tragedy.

photo by Jenny Graham

photo by Jenny Graham

And what a gorgeous marketplace it is! No wonder Elesin is reluctant to leave it. In terms of lighting, set and costume design, this is one of the most beautiful productions I have ever seen. My daughter, who makes elaborate Irish Dance costumes for a living, was sitting beside me fairly drooling over the fabrics throughout the entire first half. The mix of royal blues and golds with earthier hues creates a vibrant African palette perfectly suiting the poetic language and lust-for-life energy of the protagonist, Elesin.

The visual vibrancy is counterpointed by a magically evocative trio of African drummers that literally lead the audience into the theatre, transporting the viewers like Yoruban Pied Pipers into another time, another world. For me, it was something like seeing Tolkien’s Shire for the first time in Fellowship of the RIng—exotic yet homey, poetic yet earthy, warm but dramatic, all at the same time; like a place you’ve visited in one of your lovelier dreams, and would rather like to stay in for a while. The contrast/complementarity of high diction, metaphors drawn from nature, and the most fundamental of subject matters (sex! death!) was little short of Shakespearean.

Knowing nothing about the play or its author, I assumed we were seeing a story from ancient times, before the Europeans and slavers arrived; perhaps drawn from myth or some ancient tale passed down through the generations in one of those Yoruban markets. Indeed, the complete (for lack of better words) unmodernness, un-Westernness of the show’s first half made it all the more shocking, after we see, as in a dream, Elesin’s death-dance, to return from intermission and have the second half open on a garish, bright-white scene from a wholly different culture: a European-style drawing room where a couple of WWI-era British colonials, dressed up like thoughtless children in African ceremonial robes, practice (to a cheesy tango recording, no less) their dance moves for tonight’s ball in honor of the visiting Prince of Wales. To this audience member, it felt like a bucket of icewater poured over my head.

Remember Achebe’s take on Conrad’s Heart of Darkness? Even if Conrad was no Kiplingesque apologist for colonialism, his little masterpiece is notwithstanding so wholly imbued with a (fundamentally racist) European viewpoint that the Africans come off to the reader as wholly alien, wholy “other”. That’s how most of us in the English-speaking world are used to seeing things. This play turns the tables on that situation more effectively than anything I’ve ever seen—hence my wish that playgoers could see it, as I did, without backstory.

photo by Jenny Graham

photo by Jenny Graham

The upshot is, story-wise, upon learning of the ritual suicide about to take place, the well-meaning-but-clueless British officer, Simon Pilkings, cannot resist “putting in his oar”. He takes the already hesitating Elesin prisoner, bringing dishonor on the Horseman and cultural disaster to the people—a disaster which can only be set to rights by a tragic death. The fact that all this is taking place in the middle of the first World War (“all Europe went into the making of Kurtz!”), with its millions of casualties in the name of…what?…only serves to underline the racist absurdity of the situation.

Or, as Iyaloja says in what surely must be the most quotable line in the play: “To prevent one death, you will actually make other deaths? Ah, great is the wisdom of the white race!

A couple of casting notes: With his kingly presence and a voice made for poetry, I can’t imagine a better actor to play Elesin than Derrick Lee Weeden; his gifts make the play’s central turn all the more tragic. Perri Gaffney as Iyaloja was a force to be reckoned with; I can well imagine future generations of black actresses ready to walk over corpses to get this juicy part, reminiscent to me of Margaret in Richard III.

We’ll report back when we see the play again, later in the season. Definitely one of the “musts” of the 2009 Oregon Shakespeare Festival!

  • Share/Bookmark

"You'll never get it right…"

Dan DonohueEver since I began writing The Mystery of Things, I’ve had a fascination for Shakespeare’s villains in general and Iago in particular. It’s the “why?” question, as Dan Donohue, one of our favorite actors, points out in a lively and revealing interview on the Oregon Shakespeare Festival website called “Playing Iago.”

My favorite quote, besides “You’ll never get it right,” is this:: “The character Iago is a better actor than I am.” Still, I think we can expect some pretty damned decent acting when Dan’s run as the greatest villain in English literature begins on the OSF Elizabethan stage in June…we can’t wait!

The interview is 27 minutes long. Click on the Othello link here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.

Bad Behavior has blocked 3877 access attempts in the last 7 days.